![]() |
|
|
|
|
Article
355, one of the most rarely used provisions of the Constitution,
enshrines on the Central Government a
“duty to protect every state against external aggression and
internal disturbance and to ensure that the government of every state
is carried on in accordance with the provisions of this
Constitution”. Article
355 is one of the three controversial “emergency provisions” in
the Constitution along with Article 352, which empowers the Centre to
impose a national Emergency, and Article 356, which enables it to
dismiss a state government. In practice, it is a warning message to
the state government that the Centre is ready to intervene in the
administration of the state and restore order, if necessary. “It
is clear from Article 355 that it is not an independent source of
power for interference with the functioning of the state government
but is in the nature of justification for the measures to be adopted
under Articles 356 and 357,” the Supreme Court ruled in its landmark
S R Bommai vs Union of India case in
1994, making it clear that the dismissal of a state government must be
preceded by invoking of Article 355. The
Sarkaria Commission on Centre-State relations also recommended that
the Centre exhaust all alternative courses available to the Many
political parties, including CPI and CPM, have asked for a repeal of
Articles 355 and 356. Significantly, BJP leader L K Advani last year
demanded the use of Article 355 against the Article 355: Why it comes with a ‘Handle With Care’ warning Depending on who’s in charge at the Centre and the state, it can mean either an offer of help or a stern warning Under Art 355, Centre has “duty to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbance and to ensure that the government of every state is carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.” (Source: The Indian Expres.com, 19 September, 2008) |
|
![]() |